Although Law is often influenced by values, nowadays a widely Suspension Shock Absorber Bracket held expert opinion is that the application of law is a result or rational reasoning.It is believed that those applying legal rules consider the conflicting arguments from both parties, and come to a decision by rational means.Nevertheless, new discoveries from Neuroscience and Moral Psychology show that many of these moral judgments that inevitably underlie legal judgments occur unconsciously and not rationally.Once such judgments are passed, they are immune to any dissenting rational argument.
Through literature review, we discuss in the present paper some derivations of these new findings to Law.For instance, it is advisable that deeper philosophical training is installed in professional qualification for lawyers and magistrates, making these people more open-minded towards reasons against their own moral convictions.Furthermore, it is important to consider limiting the VERVAIN mandate of Hight Courts Ministers, in order to prevent that the moral convictions of these people pervade for too long.